Showing posts with label medicare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medicare. Show all posts

Sunday, March 10, 2013

A Bit of History about Medicare

Medicare is a federal social insurance program covering over 40 million people over the age of 65 and 8 million people with permanent disabilities. 

Medicare has four basic programs, Parts A through D.  Part A covers hospital insurance including inpatient hospital stays, skilled nursing facility stays, hospice care and home health visits.  Part A is primarily financed by a 1.45% payroll tax on all wage and salary income for the worker and the employer.  Self-employed persons pay the full 2.9% of earnings.

Example:  You make $50,000 a year.  You pay $725 a year and your employer pays $725.00 a year.  If you’re self-employed, you pay $1,450 a year.

While Social Security taxes are capped at $110,100, there is no maximum wage base for Medicare taxes.  An individual making $1,000,000 a year would pay a Medicare payroll tax of $14,500, and his employer would pay an equal amount. 

Medicare Part B is a voluntary program that helps pay for doctor bills and other outpatient health care. Medicare beneficiaries pay a premium of $99.90 (goes up every year, and it’s more than this) a month for their part B coverage.  Part B is usually deducted from the beneficiary’s monthly Social Security check.  The premium is set annually to cover about 25 percent of Part B spending, while the other 75 percent is paid from general revenues.

Medicare Part C is known as Medicare Advantage (MA), and gives seniors the option of receiving their benefits through private health plan. 

Medicare Part D provides prescription drug benefits through private plans that contract with Medicare and Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans.  The average monthly premium for Part D is $31.

Income-Related Part B Premium—Beneficiaries with incomes above $85,000 a year ($170,000 for couples) are responsible for paying a higher share of the cost of Part B.  Medicaid pays Part B premiums for low-income beneficiaries who are currently enrolled in Medicaid; beneficiaries with higher incomes pay an income-related Part B premium that ranges from $139.90 to $319.70 per month.  Medicare provides low-income subsidies to those who qualify.

Medicare under went its first major overhaul when “diagnosis related groups”  -DRGS- entered the medical lexicon in 1983.  By 1984 hospital payments were determined on the basis of a patient’s diagnosis rather than on daily charges.

Medicare officials hoped to cut program costs by creating a new payment system that would encourage hospitals not over utilize medical resources.  Instead of paying for each medical service and what it costs the hospital, Medicare began paying for what it deemed the average cost to treat a patient with a particular diagnosis.  If you were paying for bundled diagnoses, then that would give the hospitals some good reason to be attentive to the cost of taking care of diagnosis.  There was a lot of hope this would be the panacea, but instead some hospitals cleverly unpacked the diagnoses to make the most bang for each patient treated at a hospital. 

DRGS had a noticeable effect by decreasing hospital stays, but the doctors (who make the call to admit a patient to the hospital) weren't seeing a financial incentive to have the patient admitted to the hospital.  This kept hospital costs down for insurance companies. 

In 1992, Medicare adopted the resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) on which to base physician payments.  This method of payment attempted to pay based on work effort and practice expenditures, rather than on historic charges.  They were primarily concerned with medical inflation.  Another reason for moving to RBRVS was to help primary care physicians get paid more, but it only helped a little.

This is just a small portion of the problem with Medicare.  The day may come when Medicare will only be available for the poor and the rest will just have to have supplemental insurance to cover medical expenses. 

My sources are National Academy of Social Insurance; http://www.nasi.org/learn/medicare/where-money-comes-from and Medpage Today's KevinMD.com; http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/history-medicare.   You can find a lot more information on these sites and others.  

Have a great week, and I'll be back next Sunday. 

Best always,
Sandra K. Marshall

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Raise the Age for Social Security and Medicare


Should the age for social security and Medicare be raised in order to take care of the deficit?  Right now, anyone can retire and draw social security at sixty-two, and receive Medicare at sixty-five.  You say we have that right because we paid into these entitlements (I don’t understand why they’re called entitlements) for forty, fifty years, or more.  We’re still paying into Medicare every month as the money is being taken out of social security checks from retirees.

I'm going to focus on social security because this topic is too huge to talk about along with Medicare.  Next week, I'll talk about Medicare.  This topic causes a lot of ill will among young and old, but it's got to be addressed. 

Okay, here goes my feeble attempt to throw some light on this subject to help everyone understand Social Security.  We all pay into social security with our FICA taxes taken monthly, biweekly or weekly.  This money goes into an interest bearing trust fund.  Social security has it's own budget.

At one time the social security trust fund had 2.6 trillion in it paid through payroll taxes.  Since 1982 social security has had excesses from $89 million to $190 million, all loaned to the government.  By 2020, the government will be in debt to social security by 3.1 trillion.  Now, that's huge. 

By law, social security surpluses must be loaned to the federal government, a requirement established in the original Social Security act of 1935. (I didn't know that, did you?)  The federal government is legally required to pay back this money to the social security program with interest, and it supposedly has done so.  (I would like to see the records.)  This money becomes part of the national debt. 

As of December 31, 2011, the U.S. Government owed $2, 679 billion to the trust fund (part of our national debt).  This is the latest information I could find.  There is a lot of information out there, and it's possible I missed something more recent. 

Here are my information sources:  Social Security Trust Fund - Forbes magazine contributor, Merrill Matthews - 7-13-11; Business Finance and Law by Luann PothuisjeODell - a year ago; Just Facts, a resource for independent thinkers by James D. Agresti and Stephen F. Cardone - January 27, 2011, revised 1-12-13.  http://www.justfacts.com/socialsecurity.asp

I welcome all comments, but there will be no attacks here.  This is the time for a healthy discussion on social security, and we all need to know what is going on. 

Thank you for joining in this discussion, and I'll see you next Sunday.  Have a great week.
 
Sandra K. Marshall

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Should Social Security be considered an Entitlement?

Hi Everyone,
I don’t know about you, but for months I’ve been listening to the politicians talking about Social Security being an entitlement program. Its made me furious. I started paying into Social Security at sixteen and have paid into it ever since.  Of course, I’m entitled to Social Security benefits, but the politicians make the word entitlement sound like a dirty word.  They try to make everyone believe the people who draw entitlements are free loaders and not responsible hard working folks.

It’s no wonder seniors are upset by their elected officials.  Below is a definition of entitlement.

Definition of entitlement by Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary:  1a: the state or condition of being entitled: Right  b: a right to benefits specified by law or contract  2: a government program providing benefits to members of a specified group; also : funds supporting or distributed by such a program.

Okay, so Social Security is an entitlement, so why is the word being smeared and used in such condescension? Below is a little history about how Social Security was started.

The Social Security Act was signed by FDR on 8/14/35. Taxes were collected for the first time in January 1937 and the first one-time, lump-sum payments were made that same month. Regular ongoing monthly benefits started in January 1940.

Medicare was passed into law on July 30, 1965 but beneficiaries were first able to sign-up for the program on July 1, 1966.

Under the 1935 law, what we now think of as Social Security only paid retirement benefits to the primary worker. A 1939 change in the law added survivors’ benefits and benefits for the retiree's spouse and children. In 1956 disability benefits were added.

Keep in mind, however, that the Social Security Act itself was much broader than just the program which today we commonly describe as "Social Security." The original 1935 law contained the first national unemployment compensation program, aid to the states for various health and welfare programs, and the Aid to Dependent Children program. (Full text of the 1935 law.)

Social security earns interest.  By law, the assets of the Social Security program must be invested in securities guaranteed as to both principal and interest. The Trust Funds hold a mix of short-term and long-term government bonds. The Trust Funds can hold both regular Treasury securities and "special obligation" securities issued only to federal trust funds. In practice, most of the securities in the Social Security Trust Funds are of the "special obligation" type. (See additional explanation from SSA's Office of the Actuary.)

The Trust Funds earn interest which is set at the average market yield on long-term Treasury securities. Interest earnings on the invested assets of the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds were $55.5 billion in calendar year 1999. This represented an effective annual interest rate of 6.9 percent.

The Trust Funds have earned interest in every year since the program began. More detailed information on the Trust Fund investments can be found in the Annual Report of the Social Security Trustees and on the Actuary's web pages concerning the Investment Transactions and Investment Holdings of the Trust Funds.

Much more information can be found at: http://www.ssa.gov/history/hfaq.html

Yes, Social Security is an entitlement program.  It covers a huge amount of programs under its umbrella.  Should there be some cuts?  I’m not going to answer that question because I don’t know.  No one can afford cuts, but something has to be done.  I do believe our government should stop using Social Security for every program they can come up with.  In my opinion, social security and Medicare should not include welfare and some other entitlements under its umbrella. 

I’m not against helping people, but I just think welfare should be under some other program.  What do you think about our social security?  Frankly, I don’t think social security is the problem.

Have a great week, and I’ll see you all next week. 

Sandy
http://www.skaymarshall.com